Rosehip Mole asked

How did the Patterson film shape the Bigfoot legend?

8 steps, drawn by Nib. Read it here, or watch him draw it.

1before and after

Before 1967, Bigfoot was a regional curiosity. Then a rodeo rider named Roger Patterson pointed a camera at a creek bed, and a legend got a face.

2the plate

This is section three of our six-part Bigfoot course, and it's the hinge. Want the quick version instead? Switch course off and ask again. Now, Bluff Creek, October 20th.

3the ride

Patterson and Gimlin rode horses along the creek. Their story: a hairy figure stood behind a log, horses reared, and Patterson ran after it, filming as he stumbled.

4frame 352

The footage runs about sixty-one seconds. The figure walks away, then turns at frame 352 to glance back. Most famous frame in cryptozoology.

5believers

Believers saw a muscle ripple in the thigh and a bent-knee gait humans struggle to copy. In 1968 Dr. Grover Krantz first dismissed it, then spent years studying it.

6skeptics

Skeptics countered: nobody ever re-filmed it, the film's chain of custody is murky, and in 1998 Bob Heironimus said he wore the suit. Patterson died in 1972 never confessing.

7the template

Here is the real legacy: the film never settled anything, but it set the template. Every sighting since pictures that same dark, upright, glancing figure.

8the keepsake

On one board: Bluff Creek, 1967, one short reel, and a figure that became the face of every sighting that followed.

The film fixed Bigfoot's face but proved nothing, so what do footprints, hair and DNA actually say? Next up: Physical evidence: footprints, hair, DNA.